Re: cvs: php4 / LICENSE

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 11:25 AM 7/22/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > >derick@php.net wrote: > >>On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Stig Bakken wrote: > >>>+ 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor > >>>+ may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission > >>>+ from group@php.net. You may indicate that your software works in > >>>+ conjunction with PHP by saying "Foo for PHP" instead of calling > >>>+ it "PHP Foo" or "phpfoo" > >> > >>Are phpMyAdmin and PHP OpenTracker forms of derived software? > >>Derick > > > >I think older statement is better... > > > >"ezmlm for PHP" sounds strange. > >Do I need approval for "PHP ezmlm"? > > Yes you do. You also did previously but it wasn't clear enough. Apache does > the same thing. > This clause makes sure that the PHP name isn't used in ways where it isn't > clear that the product isn't PHP itself nor endorsed by the official PHP > community. Good products should be able to be successful without having to > use PHP as part of the name. This still doesn't answer my question, is PHPOpenTracker or phpMyAdmin dirived software? Derick --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.derickrethans.nl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - derick@php.net All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------