Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c var.c /main

From: Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:15:22 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c var.c /main
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-14530@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 18:00 03/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote: OG(implicit_flush) != PG(implicit_flush)
That's a myth. What exactly do you think is the difference between them? PG(implicit_flush) sets the value for OG(implicit_flush). It's simply the cache value for the INI directive implicit_flush, whereas OG(implicit_flush) is the de-facto value that the output layer uses. Let's get this behind us: From main.c, php_request_startup():
                } else if (PG(implicit_flush)) {
                        php_start_implicit_flush(TSRMLS_C);
                }
From output.c: PHPAPI void php_start_implicit_flush(TSRMLS_D) {
        OG(implicit_flush)=1;
} Come again, how different are these two?
Why is it necessary to explicitly disable output in all of the places where you added set_status() calls??
To prevent implicit_flushing.
implicit_flush should have NOTHING, NOT A THING to do with output buffering that's done by PHP. Hence, these calls are BOGUS.
As Derick noticed. <?php var_exprot('var'); ?> prints out exported var w/o it.
Right, but only because of your patch that pays attention to implicit_flush inside PHP's output buffering layer. Please revert the patch! And *KEEP* it reverted. If there are still bugs/crashes/issues once this bogus code is reverted, I volunteer to fix it. (I'm not reverting it myself since in order for this to finally end, I don't want yet another cycle of revert-recommit...) Zeev

« previous php.cvs (#14530) next »