Re: cvs: php-src /ext/hash CREDITS config.m4 hash.c /ext/hash/tests mhash_001.phpt mhash_002.phpt mhash_003.phpt skip_mhash.inc /ext/mhash config.m4
mhash.c mhash.dsp php_mhash.h /ext/mhash/tests 001.phpt 002.phpt 003.phpt skip.inc

From: Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:32:33 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php-src /ext/hash CREDITS config.m4 hash.c /ext/hash/tests mhash_001.phpt mhash_002.phpt mhash_003.phpt skip_mhash.inc /ext/mhash config.m4
mhash.c mhash.dsp php_mhash.h /ext/mhash/tests 001.phpt 002.phpt 003.phpt skip.inc
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-52449@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Jani Taskinen <jani.taskinen@sci.fi> wrote: > Pierre Joye kirjoitti: >> >> hi, >> >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Jani Taskinen <jani.taskinen@sci.fi> >> wrote: >> >>> You don't need to have multiple PHP_NEW_EXTENSION lines in config*.m4's >>> to >>> enable multiple extensions and is not really useful either since you >>> break >>> the ext_shared stuff, etc. If you do that anywhere, you're doing >>> something >>> wrong. >> >> I was not saying that, I only stated why the other ext has been kept. >> If you can do it in a clean(er) way, please go ahead :) >> >> Cheers, > > It's simply ridiculous to keep a dummy extension JUST that someone can do > extension_exists("mhash").. I agree, but you know my opinion about such BC decision :) -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.cvs (#52449) next »