Re: svn: /php/php-src/branches/

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 14:43, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote: > > On 12.03.2010, at 14:21, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Hannes Magnusson >> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:57, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jani Taskinen <jani@php.net> wrote: >>>>> jani                                     Thu, 11 Mar 2010 >>>>> 16:09:37 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> Revision: >>>>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=296076 >>>>> >>>>> Log: >>>>> Hello PHP 5.4, open for all new stuff. >>>> >>>> Instead of persisting into doing whatever you feel or want, what are >>>> you waiting for to revert your commits as requested numerous times >>>> already? >>> >>> The numerous requests for moving trunk to branches/UNICODE_EXPERIMENT >>> is the reason. >>> There no reason to kill this branch. As soon as trunk has been moved, >>> this branch will become the next trunk/ >> >> Confusions, wrong messages, bad suggestions, no reason to hurry up >> without a real plan, etc. Those are all very good reasons not to do >> it this way, especially not because someone had yet another crazy day. >> PHP really does not need such events, as our reputations about >> releases managements is slowly getting better... > > > Because no decision has been made. Jani is creating facts without basis. Furthermore normal > development is continuing on the branches we decided to have. Now there is suddenly a 5.4. The point > in time when we branch off a new trunk shouldn't be Jani deciding this because he is pissed off > because there are open OB bugs. > > So I am all for getting excited again about moving php forward, but lets not loose our head > over this. Jani has done the first step in cleaning up his mess. The next step is removing _his_ 5_4 > branch. I do not see this as negotiable and its not about proofing a point. Its simply not sensible > to keep this branch and confuse the hell out of everyone. > I'm confused by your confusion. There is a thread on internals on exactly this. Moving trunk and rename "his" branch to trunk. It seems to me we are just waiting for it to happen. -Hannes