Re: com php-src: Fixed bug #61728 (php-fpm SIGSEGV running friendica on nginx): NEWS ext/session/tests/bug61728.phpt main/main.c
| From: | Xinchen Hui | Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:45:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: com php-src: Fixed bug #61728 (php-fpm SIGSEGV running friendica on nginx): NEWS ext/session/tests/bug61728.phpt main/main.c | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-68805@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sent from my iPhone
在 2012-4-18,3:22,Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> 写道:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/4/17 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de>:
>> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:00 +0800, Laruence wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure this is a good idea - output buffers can include output
>>>>>> functions IIRC, but you have already shut down modules. I would be very,
>>>>> Stas, they are request shutdown, not module shutdown :)
>>>>
>>>> Request shutdown IIRC destroys functions and module's per-request data
>>>> structures, which user-supplied output handlers may need. Did you check
>>>> that user-supplied output handlers - especially those that use
>>>> extensions and per-request data structures - actually work after this
>>>> change?
>>>
>>> Ah, thanks, I got your point. but output handler is called in step 3:
>>> /* 3. Flush all output buffers */
>>>
>>> and as I said, all tests passed.
>>>
>>> anyway, you are right, we should be careful, I will double check it. :)
>>
>> I can't find something that breaks, but we should be really really
>> really really careful with this
Johannes, I got you point, I checked again, the out buffer deactivate
function now only release output handler stack, since mike rewritten
the whole implement.
So i think this fix seems a appropriate fix:)
>> shutdown order. changes there caused
>> trouble in the past and I rather have a error message from output
>> buffers saying "output buffer can't be used in shutdown" than changing
>> the order ...
>>
>
> It would be nice to fix this without error if it works.
> How about gave it a chance for next bug fix release?
> (i.e. 5.4.2)
>
yes, except the crash, this fix also fixed a bug that anything output
in request shutdown phase will not send to client.
Thanks
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net