Re: CVS commit guidelines (was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c)

From: Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 07:36:45 +0000
Subject: Re: CVS commit guidelines (was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c)
References: 1  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-8897@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Vlad Krupin wrote: > Arrrgh! Nah, not necessary at all. The problem is that there are no > guidelines as to what goes into the NEWS file, and a couple of years ago > I go shouted at because I did *not* do so, and it was suggested to me that a > short concise description of the fix should go there (Changelog has a > more elaborate description, NEWS has a short one). See README.CVS-RULES third > paragraph item #2. Examples at the bottom of the file sugget I do > exactly what I did too. > > In fact, since this is brought up I have a couple of questions to the rest of the team: > 1. What should be MFH'ed? Trivial fixes? Important fixes? How do I > decide what to MFH and what not? And, if a fix should be MFH'ed, then > how do I find which branch is currently used for that? Is it still 4_0_7? It's still called PHP_4_0_7, and fixes (not new functionality) should IMO always be merged from head. > 2. What fixes should go into NEWS file? Important bugfixes, new additions and changed functionality. In short, everything that could be important to users. > 3. What if I have a fix for a bug that is already assigned to someone > else? Is it ethical to send them a fix, apply it yourself, or should I > wait until they do it? I'd ask them first, if they dont respond, apply it yourself. > I am sure people who contribute patches occasionally have similar > questions. It would be neat if we could have answers to the questions > above, and put them, say, into README.CVS-RULES, or something like that. > > Happy New Year to you all! The same to you. Derick > > > Vlad > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Markus Fischer > To: Vlad Krupin > Sent: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:17:31 +0100 > Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 10:23:30AM -0000, Vlad Krupin wrote : > > vlad Mon Dec 31 05:23:30 2001 EDT > > > > Modified files: > > /php4/ext/dbase dbase.c > > Log: > > Verified and fixed bug 6852 #2. Now memo fields are 10 butes long, not 9. > > That does not seem to affect how the code works except when creating a new > > structure, in which case 'M' fields used to get created with size 9. > > @Fixed bug 6852 #2. Mem fields are now 10 bytesin size, not 9. (Vlad) > > Is a NEWS entry really necessary for every fix you apply? If > so, this would have lead to at least ten or so entries for > domxml for me.. IMHO, after you apply a series of fixes just > note you fixed several bugs and list the bug reports # if you > want to. > > -- > Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. > > ________________________________________ > Re-thinking the Web on a SinglePage(TM) > http://www.echospace.com > > > -- > PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-cvs-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-cvs-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > Derick Rethans --------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - derick@php.net SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------

« previous php.cvs (#8897) next »