Re: CVS commit guidelines (was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Wed, 02 Jan 2002 07:36:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CVS commit guidelines (was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-8897@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Vlad Krupin wrote:
> Arrrgh! Nah, not necessary at all. The problem is that there are no
> guidelines as to what goes into the NEWS file, and a couple of years ago
> I go shouted at because I did *not* do so, and it was suggested to me that a
> short concise description of the fix should go there (Changelog has a
> more elaborate description, NEWS has a short one). See README.CVS-RULES third
> paragraph item #2. Examples at the bottom of the file sugget I do
> exactly what I did too.
>
> In fact, since this is brought up I have a couple of questions to the rest of the team:
> 1. What should be MFH'ed? Trivial fixes? Important fixes? How do I
> decide what to MFH and what not? And, if a fix should be MFH'ed, then
> how do I find which branch is currently used for that? Is it still 4_0_7?
It's still called PHP_4_0_7, and fixes (not new functionality) should IMO
always be merged from head.
> 2. What fixes should go into NEWS file?
Important bugfixes, new additions and changed functionality. In short,
everything that could be important to users.
> 3. What if I have a fix for a bug that is already assigned to someone
> else? Is it ethical to send them a fix, apply it yourself, or should I
> wait until they do it?
I'd ask them first, if they dont respond, apply it yourself.
> I am sure people who contribute patches occasionally have similar
> questions. It would be neat if we could have answers to the questions
> above, and put them, say, into README.CVS-RULES, or something like that.
>
> Happy New Year to you all!
The same to you.
Derick
>
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Markus Fischer
> To: Vlad Krupin
> Sent: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:17:31 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/dbase dbase.c
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 10:23:30AM -0000, Vlad Krupin wrote :
> > vlad Mon Dec 31 05:23:30 2001 EDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > /php4/ext/dbase dbase.c
> > Log:
> > Verified and fixed bug 6852 #2. Now memo fields are 10 butes long, not 9.
> > That does not seem to affect how the code works except when creating a new
> > structure, in which case 'M' fields used to get created with size 9.
> > @Fixed bug 6852 #2. Mem fields are now 10 bytesin size, not 9. (Vlad)
>
> Is a NEWS entry really necessary for every fix you apply? If
> so, this would have lead to at least ten or so entries for
> domxml for me.. IMHO, after you apply a series of fixes just
> note you fixed several bugs and list the bug reports # if you
> want to.
>
> --
> Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
>
> ________________________________________
> Re-thinking the Web on a SinglePage(TM)
> http://www.echospace.com
>
>
> --
> PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-cvs-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-cvs-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
>
Derick Rethans
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - derick@php.net
SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------