Re: Data banks comparisons

Thanks for the answers! You say you wouldn't use. But can somebody tell me the limits? A PHP, MySQL, Apache solution can manage how many users at the same time? Thanks. Zehnder Patrick Tyson Lloyd Thwaites wrote: > <comment opinion=yes flames=no> > > Personally, I wouldn't use MYSQL for an enterprise solution. It is really > made for quick data retrieval, > and doesn't support important things such as transactions, which are > essential in any application where > data integrity is important. > > Go for at least PostgreSQL if it's only a small solution, that is it will > only be under fairly light load. 200 users > should be fine, but here we use Sybase, so I don't know how PG stands up > under strain. > > </comment> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Zehnder Patrick <patrick_zehnder@gmx.ch> > To: PHP-DB LIST <php-db@lists.php.net> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:17 PM > Subject: [PHP-DB] Data banks comparisons > > > Hi, > > > > I compare some data banks solutions for an enterprise. They need a > > solution, which is: > > - quick > > - easy and quick for programming > > - easy to use > > - safe > > - support 200 users at the same time > > > > Now, I study an Linux, Apache, PHP and MySQL solution. Can this be a > > solution for this enterprise? > > > > In the documentation of MySQL I found a lot of benchmark-information. > > But I found not the limits for a one-server-solution. What are the > > limits for this "solution". > > > > Sorry about my English. > > > > Thanks for answers! > > > > Patrick Zehnder (Switzerland) > > > > -- > > PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-db-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: php-db-help@lists.php.net > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > > > >