Re: Zend !== operator patch submission

Andi Gutmans writes: > Lars, > > The patch seems to be fine from a quick glance. My only problem is that > when we discussed it a while ago people also wanted <=== >=== and so on. We > didn't want to add another version of all the possible operators so we > decided to just keep ===. Now it might be a good idea to have !=== but I > just want to make sure that no other operators will pop up. > What do you guys think? > > BTW, patches to Zend are accepted according to the Q Public License and > there is a CVS exactly like the PHP CVS where people can commit patches. If > you're clear about the QPL then you can Email me and I'll commit your patch. > > Thanks! > > Andi > > --- > Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> > http://www.zend.com/ Well, I just got back from band practice and am still processing the beer, but I personally don't think I'd argue very hard for the <== etc. Although I can see where they may be useful, I haven't needed anything like that since I started with PHP. As to the Q Public License, I can't really find anything in it that bothers me. obIANAL: IANAL. :) But I am fine with it. Cheers, Torben