Re: Zend !== operator patch submission

OK :) Can you please remail me the diff? I'm not home now and the diff is there. Thanks, Andi On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Lars Torben Wilson wrote: > Andi Gutmans writes: > > Lars, > > > > The patch seems to be fine from a quick glance. My only problem is that > > when we discussed it a while ago people also wanted <=== >=== and so on. We > > didn't want to add another version of all the possible operators so we > > decided to just keep ===. Now it might be a good idea to have !=== but I > > just want to make sure that no other operators will pop up. > > What do you guys think? > > > > BTW, patches to Zend are accepted according to the Q Public License and > > there is a CVS exactly like the PHP CVS where people can commit patches. If > > you're clear about the QPL then you can Email me and I'll commit your patch. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Andi > > > > --- > > Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> > > http://www.zend.com/ > > Well, I just got back from band practice and am still processing the > beer, but I personally don't think I'd argue very hard for the <== > etc. Although I can see where they may be useful, I haven't needed > anything like that since I started with PHP. > > As to the Q Public License, I can't really find anything in it that > bothers me. obIANAL: IANAL. :) But I am fine with it. > > > Cheers, > > Torben >