Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #3779 Updated: Crash in syntax hilighter

FN>> In some cases, I think, it will be faster because you have FN>> to write equivalent code which has already been done in C++, FN>> which is much more efficient and short. Well, I'm far from supposing that anybody did serious effort on speed-optimizing C++ STL. Or do you have hard facts on that? FN>> It can greatly reduce the overheads (if any) in hashes, FN>> maps, arrays etc. since they are just by a number of people FN>> world-wide, so the standard library for C++ is hyper-efficient! Again, do you have any hard facts on that? Most of top-used programs in the world (one of which you probably are using just now) aren't exactly known as hyper-efficient. They are more known as the opposite, as I heard. FN>> C++ is support on almost (I don't know which doesn't) all platforms! FN>> FN>> the 'new' operator is more efficient than malloc(). How is that, knowing that new operator on most systems I saw *is* malloc() (or analogous alloc() function) plus something yet? -- Stanislav Malyshev stas@zend.com +972-3-6139665