Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #3779 Updated: Crash in syntax hilighter

From: Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:35:58 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #3779 Updated: Crash in syntax hilighter
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-16596@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Forgive the intrusion but I can't help adding my two cents into this debate. I don't think the comparison of C with C++ involves speed so much as that comparison would be as dependent on the programmer as much as the compiler of either implementation. What I do find superior in C++ over C involves maintainability, extendability and portability of an application by virtue of OOP. The design philosophy OOP offers strengthens these aspects over structured aproaches. In any event, just my two cents. Cheers. On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > AZ>> Zeev, you can't just make such a blanket statement regarding the > AZ>> performance of C++ code. I'm not suggesting Zend needs to be in C++, but > AZ>> well-written C++ code is pretty damn fast. > > In fact, I fail to see what makes C++ code be faster than C code, given > that C++ is C-derivative? > -- > Stanislav Malyshev stas@zend.com > +972-3-6139665 > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > > Randy Jonasz Software Engineer Click2net Inc. Web: http://www.click2net.com Phone: (905) 271-3550 "You cannot possibly pay a philosopher what he's worth, but try your best" -- Aristotle

« previous php.dev (#16596) next »