Re: Re: use of 'use' available?
| From: | Stanislav Malyshev | Date: | Fri, 02 Jun 2000 19:32:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: use of 'use' available? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-20091@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
CH>> Because I was under the impression that there was a performance
CH>> penalty for using include_once instead of require_once. If this
CH>> is not the case, or if it is minimal, then I will go ahead and
CH>> just use include_once.
Yes, there is, but it's not too big. Also, require with non-constant path
is in fact include anyway.
--
Stanislav Malyshev stas@zend.com
+972-3-6139665