Re: skeleton module?

On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote: > One more thing :) > Do you think it might be a good idea to change _extname_ and _EXTNAME to > just plain extname/EXTNAME. You might find people just substituting the > name itself and end up having a module with too many _'s. You got a point there. Especially when I myself also made initially a few mistakes with the right amount of _'s. :( Guess it was that small voice in my head saying 'avoid polluting namespaces, avoid...' even when in this case there's not much namespace to speak of. Anyway, everybody on the list, please have a really good look at the code. Now that it is in cvs, it probably serves as a model for a lot of self-contained extensions distributed over the net and perhaps for some included in the main distribution itself, so it'll best be perfect, not just good enough. -- Jouni