Re: Folding in user errata.

On Dec 11, Stig Bakken wrote: > Jim Winstead wrote: > > > > In case it's not obvious, I'm working on folding in the user errata > > to the manual. I've basically worked up until 'header' in the big > > list of errata, in case someone else wants to pitch in and help > > out. > > > > And if someone (Hi Stig!) could regenerate the documentation for the > > web site, we can clean up many of the errata entries since they are > > no longer errata. I figured having over 300 errata was a little out > > of control. > > If we update the online manual now, it will include lots of the 3.0.6 stuff > that isn't released yet. Do people think that's ok? I think it is reasonable. There isn't that much new that most people will be looking for (except possibly XML), and the revisions should help people who are using the "common" features. And it seems we are only a couple of days away from 3.0.6, so I think we can live with the temporary confusion. In the HOWTO.html (which is vastly out of date, no?) it mentions that there is a way to tag functions with an "implemented in" tag. Is this still possible, and does it get output? It seems like that would be a great feature. Jim -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe send an empty message to php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For help: php-dev-help@lists.php.net