Re: try..catch
| From: | ggInternet) | Date: | Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:15:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: try..catch | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-31326@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well it WOULD be nice if you could throw/catch
an user-class.. ofcourse.. but I guess thats pushing my luck :-)
Nice feature, can't wait to see it:))
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 00:01 31/08/2000, Mathieu Kooiman (ggInternet) wrote:
> >I discussed this with you once on #PHP (I'm CaPS)
> >Uhm.. back then you said you didn't want anything like throw()
> >..
> >
> >Why did you change your mind on that?
>
> What I didn't want is a Java-like, object based catch statement. I don't
> want the catch statement to catch certain types of objects in the language
> level, have several catch statements for the same try, etc. Instead, I
> believe it's much more important to answer the need to cleanly recover from
> language-level errors on one hand, and give end users the ability to send
> information to the error recovery code in userland code. This, coupled
> with the ability to selectively propagate the exception in case your code
> fails to handle it (using very simple means with virtually no
> language-level support), gives you all the power you need, without tying
> the implementation to an object oriented niche, and while keeping it very
> simple.
>
> Zeev
> --
> Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
> http://www.zend.com/
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
>