Re: try..catch

Again guys, don't hold your breath. There's a missing explanation for the (*) asterisk in my first post: (*) It's only a joke. As in, it'll probably take a long while before it's implemented, and there's a chance there won't be a good way to do it at all without revolutionary changes, in which case it'll have to wait until a major version. It's too early to decide. Zeev At 01:08 31/08/2000, André Langhorst wrote:

All of the information that is available today to error handler functions will also be available to the catch block. Namely, the filename and line number in which the error occurred, the type of the yeah, that makes my latest feature request void (be able to access __FILE__ and __LINE__ from the previous called function/method), I only needed to improve my error handler obj andré

-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/