Re: WDDX

On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 08:46:10AM -0500, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > The short form is faster to write, easier to read and faster to debug. However > > it creates certain restrictions (e.g. different variable names in WDDX/PHP) > > which cannot be easily resolved. > > The issue to resolve would be figuring out the actual variable names, I > gather. And that isn't inherently obvious how we would do that right now > without some low-level changes to actually include the variable name in > the pval struct. Aren't names stored for parameters passed by reference? If so, it would be easy to extend the syntax to wddx_serialize(&$a, $b, "notb"); resulting in <var name='a'> value of $a </var> <var name='notb'> value of $b </var> This would kill the other problem (not being able to use different namings for PHP3/WDDX variables without using an associative array). -- Regards, Sascha Schumann | Consultant | finger sas@schell.de | for PGP public key -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe send an empty message to php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For help: php-dev-help@lists.php.net