Re: Windows development
| From: | Sascha Schumann | Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 1999 11:46:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Windows development | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-3443@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 03:02:26AM -0500, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> Yes, that is the tricky part. It would be nice if we had a way of getting
> the variable name automatically in this case. One rather slow way is to
> simply walk through the symbol hash table looking for the pointer. Not
> extremely fast, but wddx_serialize() is probably not a function that is
> ever going to be something people need extreme performance on. Although,
> implementing it this way may be getting a bit silly.
>
> The idea of simply passing the variable names instead of the variables
> themselves is cleaner and probably the way to go.
It's both possible. I had spare time in the last days (my main workstation's
motherboard died and took two HDs with it, together with some not so
unimportant source code and other things). It should not be a problem to
implement both syntaxes.
Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe send an empty message to php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
For help: php-dev-help@lists.php.net