Re: IMAP patch

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 20:48, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > Quoting Sean Farley <scf@farley.org>: > > > Except that it is not a kludge according to the > > documentation. imap_mail_compose() returns a MIME message which > > imap_mail() takes as its third argument. At least this is what I > > assume. I could be totally confused on how to use these, but I think I am > > using them correctly. Isn't this how to use them: > > It is a kludge; if they're supposed to work together, they should explicitly > work together, and both should be fixed to that purpose. > > To my knowledge, imap_mail_compose() was never really finished, and > has problems (as Jani just mentioned...) Ok. It is a kludge, but it does make the present versions of these functions work better at this moment. I am not looking at my patch as something to keep long term (maybe a day or two :)) but only as a temporary fix. Thanks for the information from Jani and yourself about the situation. I appreciate it. Sean -------------- scf@farley.org PGP key: http://www.farley.org/~sean/pgp.key