Re: Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size

On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I prefer not having both of these options but just one. > Language wise it makes more sense to keep the post_max_size directive > because it includes everything and not only file uploads but as people have > always used upload_max_size it might be better to keep the old name. > Also the main question is if it is better to only have one option. They > actually aren't completely the same. The post_max_size checks the > content_length and makes sure it's not longer than the directive, the > upload_max_size is checked in rfc1867.c to see if the uploaded file doesn't > exceed a certain size. > At least to me it's not obvious how to deal with it. > Discussion? Can we always rely on content-length header being truthful? -Andrei * Gun manufacturers don't make bad products, bad parents do. *