Re: Various small patches (Zend, TSRM...)

> I don't like these (void)'s, you do, end of story :) For the archives, this was NOT an esthetical debate. Yes, "foo();" looks nicer, but that was not the question. "foo();" is simply not equivalent to "foo(void);", no matter how much some guy rants about committees going backwards etc. If you want to express that a function takes no parameters, the only way in C is to use "foo(void);". Let me say it again: It is not a matter of preference. 'nuff said. - Sascha