Re: Re: Naming changes.
| From: | Jim Winstead | Date: | Tue, 02 Jan 2001 11:41:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Naming changes. | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-42772@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
In article <5.0.2.1.2.20001228180205.035c03b8@mail.zend.com>,
zeev@zend.com wrote:
> So far, changes in the major version number were due to serious
> architecture changes. Changes in the minor version number were planned
> (for 3.1) but never actually executed, and they also involved
> architecture
> changes, but not major ones. Mostly everything else falls in the
> miniversion (3rd digit) category, we'll have dozens of those in the
> future.
why not just starting incrementing the second number on major releases
(where i'd define major as something going through the
multiple-release-candidate process like 4.0.4 did), and using that last
number for those "patchlevel" releases that are never supposed to happen?
(really, i don't care. just seems silly to have a number in the middle
that nobody knows when to use, and the "pl1" thing always irked me.)
jim