Re: Re: ctype function (re?)naming

Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > JM>> This is not in line with the other is_* functions. To keep in line with > > If you mean ctype functions, I agree - they all should be is*. If you mean > is_integer type functions - so what? It's not in line also with > mysql_num_rows function, so? That's just functions from different area, > and the fact that accidentally they start from the same two letters does > not change much. I agree. The ctype functions are wrappers for the isalnum, isalpha, etc ... C functions. Even though the functions may look like they should be of the ctype_is_xxx() format, they should probably be of the ctype_isalpha() format. --zak