Re: Re: cvs: php4(PHP_4_0_5) /sapi/fastcgi
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:00:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: php4(PHP_4_0_5) /sapi/fastcgi | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-49614@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 15:50 21/3/2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Yes, it is. Non trivial things are things that are difficult to find,
which require long and thorough testing, such as changes to core API
functions or very common modules. Figuring whether the build works or not
is trivial.
That might be true for a single build. We support dozens of
platforms and figuring out whether a change breaks something
on one particular platform is not as simple as you obviously
assume.
I don't think that there would be a real life situation in which a new module would break a build under one platform, and won't under another platform, without you actually using the module. The author has to be exceptionally 'talented' to achieve that.
I know, and as I said, I disagree. I don't think it can go unnoticed in the further RC. Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/Easily unnoticed? I beg to differ.As the Midgard extension recently showed, a single line in an extension can break everything else. And it can easily go unnoticed, especially if it is not reviewed by experienced people.Zeev, there is a difference between the terms 'will' and 'can'. I've used the latter.