Re: Re: cvs: php4(PHP_4_0_5) /sapi/fastcgi

From: Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 01:38:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4(PHP_4_0_5) /sapi/fastcgi
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-49700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I don't get it. So if it was two weeks ago, a second before I said "4.0.5RC1 is out" it was ok, and now it isn't? It doesn't make any sense. Code changes are one thing. Bugs that originate in code changes (whether they're new features, bug fixes or rewrites) may take very long time to find. The sad truth is that there's actually a good chance they won't be found even if there isn't a single line of code changed during the entire release period. That's just the nature of software bugs. The more people test, and the more time they get to test it - the better. Obviously, though, every release only gets 'truly' tested once it actually hits the road and undergoes mass distribution. We just try to maximize the chances of making it safe. New modules do not significantly increase the chances of messing up the release. Furthermore, if they do mess up the release, it's trivial to find that out. Nothing of what was said on php-dev/php-qa in this thread contradicted it (it doesn't mean that the build process is not important or anything; it does mean that it's trivial to determine whether it got messed up or not by a new module). Because of the clear gain vs. negligible loss, when Ben approached us and asked whether it's ok to put it in 4.0.5, knowing that there's another RC coming up in a couple of hours - we said that it's fine. If it's going to take changing RELEASE_PROCESS to 'allow' this to keep things quiet, then we should do it. We shouldn't consider RELEASE_PROCESS as the bible, but as guidelines to work by and improve on as we gather experience. Zeev At 03:26 22/3/2001, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
The point is, why did this issue come up in the first place? The time between releases is large, and the time in RC-branch is small. If it's so important that this module makes it in (which I can agree with), then I'm surprised it wasn't brought up when you first announced that PHP-4.0.5 would be out soon (which was a good bit of notice before RC). If it was a time issue, it wouldn't have hurt to delay the RC by a week or so until all the features were in, after all this time waiting for it :-) Anil
-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/

« previous php.dev (#49700) next »