Re: Re: Release process
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Fri, 04 May 2001 00:19:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Release process | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-53761@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 07:16 PM 5/3/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
At 03:14 AM 5/4/01 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:If so then we need to make sure that modules like the MySQL module still continue to behave exactly like they used to with isset() and other ways programmers were working. I'm not saying you're wrong. It's probably a good idea but we need to think about the consequences and other changes we might need to make at the same time before breaking stuff. We should probably save all of the NULL stuff for 4.1.x. If we do it the right way we might end up breaking certain scripts. AndiNot exactly. No matter if it is set to NULL or unset then isset() will give the same result. And most people use isset() AFAIK.Whatever the current situation, there needs to be a way to check whether a certain array entry is NULL or not.