Re: 4.0.6RC2

From: Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:14:35 +0000
Subject: Re: 4.0.6RC2
References: 1 2  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-56598@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 23 May 2001 09:58:18 -0700, andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) wrote: >At 12:23 PM 5/23/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote: >>In article <5.0.2.1.2.20010523072336.00b09af8@mail.zend.com>, "Andi >>Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> wrote: >> >> > Guys, >> > >> > I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 >> > hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it >> > with a "good" explanation of what it is and what it isn't to >> > php-general@ and get some more testing done and hopefully release 4.0.6 >> > ASAP. >> >>it doesn't look like domxml was reverted to the "old" behaviour..... > >Yeah but Colin said it works fine. Are you sure we should revert? >I really want to get 4.0.6 out of the door and roll RC2 today. >I have no clue about the DOM XML module and am not sure what we should do. >There have always been problems with it. but as I said in the thread "issues about domxml in 4.0.6" it's still almost impossible to write "cross-version" code with domxml which works in 4.0.5 and 4.0.6, just because for example the children() funcion returns a different array in the two versions. and i think, this is very nasty... I'm not sure anymore about the segfaults with the old syntax (eg domxml_children()), but as they are still in the documantation, i think a lot of people use them, as well. chregu

« previous php.dev (#56598) next »