Re: 4.0.6RC2
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Thu, 24 May 2001 12:36:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 4.0.6RC2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-56603@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I just rolled back to the 4.0.5 version of DOM/XML but can't test it.
Can you please check out the 4.0.6 branch (cvs update -r PHP_4_0_6 in the php4/Zend/TSRM directories) and let me know if the rollback worked?
Thanks,
Andi
At 11:14 AM 5/24/2001 +0000, Christian Stocker wrote:
On 23 May 2001 09:58:18 -0700, andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) wrote: At 12:23 PM 5/23/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote:Yeah but Colin said it works fine. Are you sure we should revert? I really want to get 4.0.6 out of the door and roll RC2 today. I have no clue about the DOM XML module and am not sure what we should do. There have always been problems with it. but as I said in the thread "issues about domxml in 4.0.6" it's still almost impossible to write "cross-version" code with domxml which works in 4.0.5 and 4.0.6, just because for example the children() funcion returns a different array in the two versions. and i think, this is very nasty... I'm not sure anymore about the segfaults with the old syntax (eg domxml_children()), but as they are still in the documantation, i think a lot of people use them, as well. chregu -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.netIn article <5.0.2.1.2.20010523072336.00b09af8@mail.zend.com>, "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> wrote:Guys, I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it with a "good" explanation of what it is and what it isn't to php-general@ and get some more testing done and hopefully release 4.0.6 ASAP.it doesn't look like domxml was reverted to the "old" behaviour.....