Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c

From: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:58:00 +0000
Subject: Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-60342@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > I had thought the decision was that php_<extname>.c was the correct way > to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to > conflict with any files from the package itself? > > ext_skel creates a .c file using the bare extname. I thought that convention only applied to the header files. -- Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member

« previous php.dev (#60342) next »