Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:58:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-60342@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Joey Smith wrote:
> I had thought the decision was that php_<extname>.c was the correct way
> to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to
> conflict with any files from the package itself?
>
> ext_skel creates a .c file using the bare extname.
I thought that convention only applied to the header files.
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House
Member