Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c

From: Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:19:09 +0000
Subject: Re: ext_skel and php_<extname>.c vs. <extname>.c
References: 1 2  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-60495@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Jon Parise wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > > > I had thought the decision was that php_<extname>.c was the correct way > > to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to > > conflict with any files from the package itself? > > > > ext_skel creates a .c file using the bare extname. > > I thought that convention only applied to the header files. So did I, but practices seem to differ. I find it very handy for auto-completion that the header file name always starts with "php_" (unless the extension is called P-something of course). - Stig

« previous php.dev (#60495) next »