Re: Security Issues
| From: | Cynic | Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:26:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Security Issues | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-61524@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 12:06 7/30/2001, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote the following:
--------------------------------------------------------------
>Cynic wrote:
>> >
>> >Of course it is. $foo is conceptually simpler than $_GET["foo"].
>> >I don't see how you can say it isn't.
>>
>> $foo is conceptually a few keystrokes. That's all simplicity
>> I can see.
>>
>
>I think that's the whole point ...
>
>1) $foo
>2) $_GET["foo"]
>
>One looks like PHP, the other looks like Perl :-)
>
>Anil
------end of quote------
I admit I don't know much of Perl, but my decision not to learn it
was largely based on my perception that much things in Perl happen
automagically (or just the language is too terse), making it hard
to understand.
I'm probably a strange type of guy for a PHP coder, but I like
$HTTP_*_VARS arrays, and all the servers I use have
register_globals = off, and error_reporting = E_ALL (with these
switched to on and E_ALL &~ E_NOTICE in <Directory ...> sections
where third-party code resides... I think I have yet to come across
a class or application that's written "properly" (from MPOV).
cynic@mail.cz
-------------
And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7