Re: [ZEND-ENGINE] cvs: Zend / zend.c zend_execute_API.c zend_hash.c zend_hash.h zend_list.c zend_list.h
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:24:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [ZEND-ENGINE] cvs: Zend / zend.c zend_execute_API.c zend_hash.c zend_hash.h zend_list.c zend_list.h | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-61841@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ok, I'll try to get source-level compatibility going next week.
Zeev
At 09:14 02/08/2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 09:05 02/08/2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:Can you elaborate? One thing that may make sense is keeping the old FETCH macros as no-ops. Other than that, it should pretty much build fine. That's what I had to adjust: Replace *LS_FETCH() macros with TSRMLS_FETCH(). Replace *LS_CC|DC with TSRMLS_CC|DC. Add TSRMLS_CC in a number of places where API functions are called. The last two probably apply to TS build only but I still had to do them. -Andrei * 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2. *It's only going to affect the TS build, so most extensions will be left unharmed. At any rate, leaving stuff for 4.1 has always been a way of saying 'maniana' in our group... As far as I'm concerned, we can just release the current code base as 4.1.No, I had to adjust a number of things in PHP-GTK after your changes, even in non-TS build.