Re: Re: rand_str
| From: | Daniel Andersson | Date: | Sun, 05 Aug 2001 14:47:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: rand_str | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-62149@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
yes, totally agree.
but why not put it into PEAR?
/ d
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cynic" <cynic@mail.cz>
To: "Daniel Andersson" <daniel@avantnoise.com>; <php-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 13:52
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: rand_str
> I think that new functions should be added on basis of
> usefulness, not the "coolness" factor. IMNSHO this function
> isn't very useful, and it is extremely easy to implement in
> userland:
>
> function str_rand()
> {
> $len = func_num_args() ? func_get_arg(0) : 32 ;
> return substr(md5(microtime()),0,$len);
> }
>
> At 13:57 8/5/2001, Daniel Andersson wrote the following:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >i would say so, yes.
> >
> >and if you do md5(microtime()) you have to do a substr() on the result to
> >get the desired length.
> >
> >easy done, yes. but still..
> >
> >maybe something for PEAR instead of the core?
> >
> >/ d
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Cynic" <cynic@mail.cz>
> >To: "Daniel Andersson" <daniel@avantnoise.com>;
> ><php-dev@lists.php.net>
> >Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:41
> >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: rand_str
> >
> >
> >> is it that much more useful than md5(microtime()) ?
> >> ah-oh, you want to be able to specify the set of characters...
> >>
> >> At 04:28 8/5/2001, Daniel Andersson wrote the following:
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >sounds useful and cool, me thinks :o)
> >> >
> >> >/ d
> >> >
> >> ><jeroen@php.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:20010804205438.88378.qmail@pb1.pair.com...
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm thinking about a new function: [mt_]rand_str
> >> >>
> >> >> Syntax:
> >> >> string [mt_]rand_str(minlen,maxlen[,charlist]);
> >> >>
> >> >> where charlist is in addcslashes (and now also [l|r]trim) syntax.
> >> >> Charlist defaults to 0..9a..zA..Z
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> IMHO, this would be a very useful function.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any comments? Maybe not min&maxlen, but simply a fixed len? (since
> >> >> randomness on the length is ambigious to implement, there are less
> >> >> possibilities with shorter strings, which raises some issues).
> >> >>
> >> >> As an extension, the function could also accept an array as
charlist,
> >> >> containing small strings, to produce pronouncable strings.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jeroen
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >PHP Development Mailing List
> >> ><http://www.php.net/>
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> >> >To contact the list administrators, e-mail:
php-list-admin@lists.php.net
> >> ------end of quote------
> >>
> >>
> >> cynic@mail.cz
> >> -------------
> >> And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
> >> were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
> >> - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> >For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
> ------end of quote------
>
>
> cynic@mail.cz
> -------------
> And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
> were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
> - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
>