Re: Re: rand_str

From: Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 19:53:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: rand_str
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-62172@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Hi Jeroen, > > I think we're not on the same page. :) I consider both versions > of str_rand() I posted trivial... Agree. But they are not what rand_str could do. The result has 16 different chars, just because md5 happens to have that much. Implementing something that has NOT that limitation, is far less trivial. Below is a - limited - implementation > Also, and this is strictly subjective, I don't think the function > needs to be implemented natively. As I said, it's trivial. :) But > my stance could be rated as -0.3... Actually, as I'm thinking about > it, -0.2. k, mine is 0.8, 0.9, on the idea, not the details > as for the rand_str($len , "1..9a..f\x4F") proto: > I don't like it. KISS. Better suggestions? Simple length and a list of characters... and the list-of-characters way is also in addcslashes, and the trims. Jeroen

« previous php.dev (#62172) next »