Re: Setting up RFC

Jim wrote: > Zak Greant <jag@nucleus.com> wrote: > > :) I should have chosen the symbols more carefully. > > They seem to have generated more comments than the original proposal... > > > > Does anyone have any comments pertaining to the *concept*? :) > > i was trying to drive at the point that you've just restated a > slightly weaker form of the apache project guidelines. Not quite. I was just describing a tool to help in browsing the accumulated opinions. > (now, a tool to make it easier to implement those guidelines may be a > good idea. but i see that as distinct from the process itself. and i > think anything that moves discussion out of email is doomed to fail.) Possibly... given how many discussions fail (or are doomed to some sort of unlife - like the function renaming discussion) I don't see how it could hurt to try. :) > the real problem is determining who gets to vote. I am not even worried about votes, etc. I just want a way to more easily keep track of what is going on. :) The rating were just there to provide a quick way to track general opinion. --zak