Re: pif
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:55:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: pif | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-64086@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > What's wrong with php_ prefix?
>
> Nothing. It is just the same prefix as for PHPAPI functions, and the purpose
> was to diffentiate in the name between helper functions and API-functions.
> But starting it with an underscore is also a good way of achieving that, on
> second thought.
I'm against that. Usually underscore-prefixed symbols are used by system
libraries and OS and we don't need to go in that direction. I'm also
against using pif_, because it's not an internal function that you are
naming, but rather, a helper one.
-Andrei
* Proximity bug: when the program crashes in front of important visitors. *