Re: pif

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > I'm against that. Usually underscore-prefixed symbols are used by system > > libraries and OS and we don't need to go in that direction. I'm also > > against using pif_, because it's not an internal function that you are > > naming, but rather, a helper one. > > I don't really have an opinion on this matter, I just wanted to know what to > do. So you are suggesting to simply stick with php_ prefix and not doing > anything else? > > Then I'll comply with that. In math.c, I saw that use of underscore as first > letter, so that is not according to how it should be done, I assume. It's a remnant from PHP 3. -Andrei "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton