Re: Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

I completely understand your point. Some people feel they need those extra 10% for production machines. But are you actually planning on running Apache 2 on a heavily loaded production machine? If yes, I think it might still be a bit early to abandon 1.3.x. If no and you just want to mess around with it and test it, then you can use apxs for a while ;) Andi At 05:30 PM 2/25/2002 -0800, August wrote:

Hey Yasuo, Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend static compiles. Thanks... - AZ -----Original Message----- From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:yasuo_ohgaki@yahoo.com] August wrote: Sebastian wrote:

if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO anyhow? It's the preferred method.

Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented somewhere? In apache document. I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache. For instance, I would like to use info or status module when I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all the time. -- Yasuo Ohgaki _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php