RE: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
| From: | August | Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:42:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-80414@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
You've pretty much nailed the plan on the head here. Not even close to
running Apache 2 on a production machine, stability/familiarity trumps
that thought any day. Was planning on developing against Apache 2 DSO
style, and simultaneously trying to nudge things along on the static
build side so that in a few months would have the option of rolling out
statically when it mattered. Thought Apache beta might be a good point
to start doing that.
- August
-----Original Message-----
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:23 AM
To: August; php-dev@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
I completely understand your point. Some people feel they need those
extra
10% for production machines.
But are you actually planning on running Apache 2 on a heavily loaded
production machine? If yes, I think it might still be a bit early to
abandon 1.3.x. If no and you just want to mess around with it and test
it,
then you can use apxs for a while ;)
Andi
At 05:30 PM 2/25/2002 -0800, August wrote:
>Hey Yasuo,
>
>Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most
>instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend
>static compiles.
>
>Thanks...
>
>- AZ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:yasuo_ohgaki@yahoo.com]
>August wrote:
> > Sebastian wrote:
> >>if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO
> >>anyhow? It's the preferred method.
> >>
> >
> > Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented
> > somewhere?
>
>In apache document.
>
> >
> > I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it
> > makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of
> > compile is negligible when looking at something that will be
> > installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for
> > larger server farms.
>
>The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache.
>
>For instance, I would like to use info or status module when
>I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all
>the time.
>
>--
>Yasuo Ohgaki
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>--
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php