Re: GD Shared library confusion
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Sun, 03 Mar 2002 17:44:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: GD Shared library confusion | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-80645@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4 (1.920 2001/04/24 23:26:18)
And no, none of my /usr/lib/*pspell*.la files have -L/usr/lib in their
dependency_libs. Lots of other .la files in /usr/lib have that, but not
pspell.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> Libtool version? Not all have this problem..
>
> --Jani
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:16:07PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote :
> >>
> >> As long as the config.m4's use PHP_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH()
> >> and the other macros and don't touch LIBS themselves,
> >> there won't be any /usr/lib entries in it.
> >>
> >> So, I'd check the .la files. There's propably libpspell.la
> >> which has -L/usr/lib defined in 'dependency_libs='.
> >>
> >> And then you can complain to the libtool folks about this. :)
> >> Easiest way to fix/test this is to just move all the .la files
> >> from /usr/lib to some other place.
> >
> > Are you sure? On my system nearly all .la files contain
> > -L/usr/lib in the dependency_libs line ...
> >
> >$ grep dependency_libs /usr/lib/*.la|grep -- '-L/usr/lib '|wc -l
> > 138
> >
> > Or am I missing some specific point?
> >
> >
>
> --
>