RE: [PHP-DEV] The PHP Platform
| From: | Rose, Billy | Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 02:29:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] The PHP Platform | ||
| Groups: | php.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-82797@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Have you buried your head into the source code to see how it works? If not,
I suggest looking at what they have done before making the statement over
performance. There is nothing I have seen that suggests they are
implementing slowness (on purpose, by mistake, or for lack of time). These
guys _know_ what the hell there're doing. The fact that Zend goes one step
further to make PHP really smoke by offering their products, tells me PHP is
a solid platform they must really trust. Further still, that they really
trust open source. Everyone has had problems with a credit card at times,
that does not reflect on the base product, or the guys that have developed,
built, maintained, and enhanced it.
Billy Rose
wrose@loislaw.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: medvitz [mailto:medvitz@medvitz.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: php-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The PHP Platform
>
>
>
> I don't really have an issue with the Zend people making
> money from their
> products.
>
> The concern I have is that they sell perfoamance enhancing products.
> Because they are selling these, I worry that performance in
> the base Zend
> engine will not be / is not a primary concern. I think that
> performance
> should be a top priority for the 'base' engine. People
> outside of Zend are
> contributing a good amount of time to creating extensions,
> writing PEAR
> modules, and promoting PHP, and , in my opinion , these
> efforts are being
> used by Zend who are holding back on performance.
>
> Yes... the optimizer is free. But it doesn't always have to be.
>
> I like PHP, I use PHP, I use PHP for clients work, so yes....
> I make money
> off of PHP. I expect that the Zend psople can as well,
> without holding
> back on the community that helped them get where they are today.
>
>
> I've got some biases here. I was a subscriber, for a time to the
> developer's pachage that they had towards the beginning. For
> $600 a year I
> got the Encoder, the debug server and 2 client licenses.
> They had a pay by
> month option and I selected this, as my company wasn't going
> to reimburse
> me for this expense. When my bank got bought and I had to
> get use a new
> card to keep up on the payments no one could do it. I
> emailed the people
> who handled the credit card transactiosn, and I emailed Zend.
> I got no
> responsse what-so-ever, but a lot of emails telling me they
> couldn't bill
> my card (all of which I replied to asking how to change my
> card info). I'm
> glad you have had good expeirience with them, 'cause I
> haven't. And the
> package that made the mose sense to me, they no longer offer.
>
>
> Medvitz
>
>
> Dave Mertens wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 07:32:47PM -0400, medvitz wrote:
> >> The issue I have with PHP is that the people in charge
> have reasons for
> >> not
> >> implementing performance enhancements in the base code.
> They charge a
> >> fair
> >> amount for add-ons that increases performance drastically. I could
> >> actually argue that extensibility and performance on the
> back end aren't
> >> what they should be for this reason.
> >>
> >> Not that I want to make enemies here, but I think this is
> a realistic
> >> criticism. Not to mention that the Qt license that is
> used prevents
> >> anyone from making extensions and selling them w/o an
> additional license
> >> from the
> >> Zend people. So they are able to make money off of the
> hard work of all
> >> of the module contributors, which I think really blows.
> >
> > So if i understand what your saying you don't like that
> fact the Zend had
> > write an (very) good engine for PHP4 and now is making some
> money with
> > it??
> >
> > Don't forget Zend is a commercial company that is doing a
> lot for the open
> > source community. Without them you didn't had PHP4!
> >
> > Without all the Zend optimalisations (but with the free
> Zend Optimzer
> > (You've installed it, right?!)) PHP4 has a good
> performance. With the
> > money they make with their products like Zend Encoder, Zend
> Cache, etc
> > they can continue developing on the Zend Engine.
> >
> > They don't force you to but their products. They only say
> that they can
> > really speed up your code.
> > Companies where i work (a official gold microsoft partner
> ;-( ) has also
> > bought the Zend products.
> >
> > My boss thinks the Zend products are very cheap in comparisment with
> > Microsoft products.
> >
> > Microsoft is doing the same thing. They provide you with a
> 'free' IIS
> > webserver, but they have also products that enhance IIS
> like Commerce
> > Server, Content Server, etc.
> >
> > The fact that a commercial company like Zend is working on
> PHP is for a
> > large number of companies very important. Most open-source
> projects don't
> > have a proper helpdesk. Zend is providing a very good helpdesk.
> >
> > But all this have two sides. While we (PHP developers)
> build upon PHP4,
> > and make money with the applications we write with it. And
> Zend is making
> > money with other Zend products and they make sure PHP is
> good enough for
> > companies.
> >
> > So don't trap Zend into the ground. Because of them you can
> program OOP in
> > PHP!
> >
> > That all from me..
> >
> > Dave Mertens
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>