RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] include statement in php.ini file
| From: | derick@php.net | Date: | Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:20:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] include statement in php.ini file | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-88701@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 19:27 26/09/2002, David Viner wrote:
> >If the term "include" is not a good keyword, I'm also happy to rework the
> >patch to use any keyword the group prefers. "additional_ini" sounds good to
> >me, and probably doesn't carry the other control-structure baggage.
>
> I don't think that additional_ini carries any less control-structure
> baggage; If you can include various ini files using various statements in
> php.ini, it begs for adding control structures to perform this task
> selectively. I'm very much against it. It also doesn't make modular
> deployment that much easier - if you still have to add statements to the
> php.ini file in order to get it going.
>
> I think that a dynamic deployment directory makes good sense, I don't think
> it has a high wtf factor, and it doesn't push us anywhere towards needing
> control structures. It becomes a feature of PHP, instead of a feature of
> the php.ini syntax. It's something we can even set up during 'make
> install' with a default being /usr/local/etc/additional_php_inis or
> something like that.
I agree with this.
Derick
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
JDI Media Solutions
--------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-