Re: cvs: php4 / Makefile.global
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:27:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: php4 / Makefile.global | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-90029@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Jon Parise wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:38:09PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:I really fail to see why we need to ask troubles for executing run-tests.php. It's executed by various people and better to run always with less problems when people typed "make test". Anyway, main problem is Derick is changing the line w/o knowledge of the consequence. He hasn't even fixed a issue I mentioned, yet he reverted my patch twice. 1st time is ok, since he didn't know, 2nd time is not ok since I let him know. He should fix the problem I mentioned at the same time at least. Don't think it's rude, Derick :) Or is it too difficult for you to fix, even the problem I explicitly mentioned? -- Yasuo OhgakiHi Ilia and Jon, Do you still think specifying ini used _for_ run-tests.php is bad thing? I hope I've explained enough. I think you don't care, do you?I don't want to involve myself in some sort of religious argument that I honestly know very little about. I do care about technical things, however. So, once again, all I really want to know is what is so special about php.ini-dist? And what _specific_ settings do you (Yasuo) feel must be applied to run-tests.php in order to run properly? And why can't they just be specified via ini_set() calls. In short, I just want to know why run-tests.php needs an external dependency on php.ini-dist. I would much prefer run-tests.php to be self-contained.