Re: I hope this is the last email about this :) (was
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:01:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: I hope this is the last email about this :) (was | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-90048@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 02:51 24-10-2002, Alan Knowles wrote:? Which mass ? Are you going to insist most scripts need inefficient auto flushing? Have you ever used other programming languages? I don't get it, but this is the 3rd vote. Too few still and reasoning is too weak. BTW, if anyone would like to vote for inefficient/mostly useless auto flushing. Please add your vote to this article. http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.dev&article=89995 -- Yasuo OhgakiIm +1 for reverting the patch - (for what it's worth) Why? Well - most 'average' (and below) PHP programmers when attempting to do CLI programming, will get a serious WTF reaction from wondering why when they 'echo' stuff, it doesnt appear. The more advanced Users can manually turn off flushing, but for most small, quick scripts (eg. 50%+), this instant flush is going to be perfectly acceptable..My thoughts exactly. Defaults should work for the masses - it's not like it's enforced behavior, that is irreversible.