Re: I hope this is the last email about this :) (was
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:31:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: I hope this is the last email about this :) (was | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-90053@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 10:01 24/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:Too few? It's 3 times more than the votes in favour, and now it's 4 times more. Too weak? That's your opinion, and it doesn't weigh more than others'. ZeevAt 02:51 24-10-2002, Alan Knowles wrote:? Which mass ? Are you going to insist most scripts need inefficient auto flushing? Have you ever used other programming languages? I don't get it, but this is the 3rd vote. Too few still and reasoning is too weak.Im +1 for reverting the patch - (for what it's worth) Why? Well - most 'average' (and below) PHP programmers when attempting to do CLI programming, will get a serious WTF reaction from wondering why when they 'echo' stuff, it doesnt appear. The more advanced Users can manually turn off flushing, but for most small, quick scripts (eg. 50%+), this instant flush is going to be perfectly acceptable..My thoughts exactly. Defaults should work for the masses - it's not like it's enforced behavior, that is irreversible.