Re: apache_hooks
| From: | George Schlossnagle | Date: | Sun, 03 Nov 2002 08:35:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: apache_hooks | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-90467@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Either way works for me. Psychologically, I think it may get higher exposure if it is #ifdef'd, but I have style reservations about doing that. How has this sort of thing been done in the past? Is it undesirable to fork the apache sapi into a new 'apache_hooks' sapi? That may be easiest.
George
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 05:58 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
What do you think would be the best way to make the apache_hooks code more accessible to people? A tarball with the relevant files that overwrites the standard files, or perhaps it is time to #ifdef it into the main branch? -Rasmus // George Schlossnagle// Principal Consultant
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com// (c) 240.460.5234 (e) george@omniti.com // 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0