Re: apache_hooks

Well, since 99% of the code is the same, I'd be worried about people remembering to merge fixes across. At least if it is ifdef'ed people see the code. But yes, I agree, that's not pretty either. -R On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote: > Either way works for me. Psychologically, I think it may get higher > exposure if it is #ifdef'd, but I have style reservations about doing > that. How has this sort of thing been done in the past? Is it > undesirable to fork the apache sapi into a new 'apache_hooks' sapi? > That may be easiest. > > George > > On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 05:58 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > What do you think would be the best way to make the apache_hooks code > > more > > accessible to people? A tarball with the relevant files that overwrites > > the standard files, or perhaps it is time to #ifdef it into the main > > branch? > > > > -Rasmus > > > > > // George Schlossnagle > // Principal Consultant > // OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com > // (c) 240.460.5234 (e) george@omniti.com > // 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0 >