Doc #52835 [Wfx]: readfile sample allows directory download
| From: | aharvey@php.net | Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:27:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Doc #52835 [Wfx]: readfile sample allows directory download | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-bugs+get-5037@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52835&edit=1
ID: 52835
Updated by: aharvey@php.net
Reported by: kittya at breyfamily dot net
Summary: readfile sample allows directory download
Status: Wont fix
Type: Documentation Problem
Package: Documentation problem
PHP Version: 5.3.3
Assigned To: aharvey
Block user comment: N
New Comment:
Don't get me wrong, it's certainly possible to make the example work
with links and special files as well.
My concern is that we're then complicating an example that's
specifically demonstrating the usage of readfile() with a
Content-Disposition header -- down to having an explicit line at the top
defining $file as something that's obviously the name of a file, not a
directory. I just think any potential change would only make the intent
of the example less clear than it already is.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-15 01:26:03] kittya at breyfamily dot net
The example may not be so contrived after all. I found the example when
I was looking for code to do just what the example does. Before
submitting the documentation problem report, I used the example almost
verbatim in a project:
http://sermonsontheweb.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sermonsontheweb/trunk/Web/ChurchWebSite/Sermons/Download.php?revision=199&view=markup
I noticed the problem when performing security testing.
There are more elegant solutions with rewrites, but the approach in the
example is simple and very portable.
Regarding is_file, perhaps links and special files cases will be OK. If
links would be followed, and the stream from special files would be
read, that would be appropriate in most scenarios.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-14 12:35:11] aharvey@php.net
Actually, on second thoughts, I'm going to leave this as it is. It's an
obviously contrived example and is_file() isn't necessarily sufficient
anyway, since it doesn't cover links and special files.
Closing won't fix.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-14 10:29:13] kittya at breyfamily dot net
Description:
------------
For the readfile function, sample 1, "Forcing a download using
readfile()" uses file_exists to check whether $file is valid. However,
if there is a directory by the name of $file, the sample code causes PHP
to try to download the directory, which will likely be meaningless to
the client.
Expected result:
----------------
The sample should use is_file.
Actual result:
--------------
The sample currently uses file_exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52835&edit=1