Re: License for documentation (here: Supporting the translation team)
| From: | Sebastian Picklum | Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:56:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: License for documentation (here: Supporting the translation team) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc.de |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-de+get-760@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
After re-thinking it for a while, I agree that Friedhelm and Thomas are
right. Someone who is willing to contribute to PHPDOC-XX will find a way
to join the team and to start work.
I also see that there is actually a large amount of people who just
apply for an cvs-account to get the prestige of a PHP-Dev/Doc-Guy
(e.g. one doctor of my university's IT-Department was very impressed as
I gave him my @php.net-address - Didn't know that we have such a good
image).
>FIRST contribute to the List, THEN get a cvs-account
This is a very nice idea. But I don't see what translators should
contribute to the list. Doesn't PHPDOC-DE fully rely on PHPDOC?
For me, I just read the DOC-DE-List for a while (and of course the
DOC-Howto), then got the cvs-account and at last started to post to
the mailing list.
Or may I understand "first contribute to the List" that s.o. should
ask the List "May I help" and then passes a sort of job-interview
and then gets the cvs-account? (Since I'm not a DEV, I don't know
anything about their CVS-Account-application-process).
Viele Grüße
Sebastian
===
From: friedhelm betz
In reply to: Thomas Schöfbeck
>> Furthermore:
>>
>> If you look at the huge list of "translators" and then realize that only
>> 20%-30% of them really do the work:
>
>I don't expect any changes, because once listed for ever listed due
>to the policy to list people who contributed. (?)
>
>> I would make it even harder, like in the dev-group: FIRST contribute to
>> the list, THEN get a cvs-account. Otherwise you create an endless number
>> of accounts for PHP-beginners which just think they might help, and then
>> they realize that it's work...
>
>One possible way to go I personally would agree. But this implies, someone
>must be williing
>to commit contributions ASAP. To go this way, we should have to provide a
>mechanism
>people can rely on like which amount first, positive votes (how much)
from
>whome?
>
>This is sort a thing like the listing of contributors to the en manual on
>phpdoc@ ;-)
>
>Friedhelm
>