Re: Перевод мануала
| From: | Antony Dovgal | Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:13:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Перевод мануала | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc.ru |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-ru+get-742@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 01/15/2007 08:19 PM, Кирилл П wrote:
Hi, All! So, I`d translate some files with apache_functions. But I have two questions: 1) Must I change revision numbers in <!-- EN-Revision: 1.8 Maintainer: tronic Status: ready --> <!-- $Revision: 1.8 $ --> lines?It's not really important as far as I understand. The first "tag" is used to track which revision was used when translation has been done, who did it and what is the status of this file. The $Revision$ tag is CVS thingy, just ignore it.
2) Please see attached files and write me what you think about this.Looks good. Some comments: 1) things like "Возвращаемый object содержит" look pretty ugly, that's why in such cases I prefer to translate everything, even though translating type names is usually bad idea. 2) I'm not sure "notes" is "аннотации" in Russian. I guess we need to leave it as is, because "notes" is actually a part of Apache struct (see httpd.h): struct request_rec { ... apr_table_t *notes; ... } What's your opinion on this? 3) Leaving "<title><function>...</function> example</title>" untranslated makes no sense. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal